Friday, September 18, 2015

Blog 1 (chapters 1 & 2)

 
Reflections 

     As I read through chapters 1 and 2, many things resonated with me and caused me to recall some of my past experiences with technology. One passage in particular, which can be found on page 38.
     " Your answers to this question highlight how children and adolescents develop                  literacy with technology in ways very different from those of older adults. Marc              Prensky (2001b) has famously classified these groups as digital natives and digital            immigrants. Younger people (born since 1980) who have grown up using instant and        interactive computer and wireless technologies are digital natives." 
    
      The passage then goes on to discuss the amount of time people in the digital native age group has spent on average on various activities relating to technology as compares with teachers that have not had such experiences. This section awakened a very found memory I have with one of my first experiences with computer technology. I was in Ms. Soulias' kindergarten class, and we had recently gotten a new program for the computer in our classroom that taught us how to use the keyboard and find specific letters by leading an ant to the correct jellybean on the screen. As a curious child, I picked up on the program rather quickly and my teacher chose me to do a demonstration of the use and educational benefit in front of the board of education. My whole family came to watch and I received a certificate of acknowledgement from both my principal and the board of education. 

    My reasoning for mentioning this story is that even back when I was in kindergarten, students were showing adults all of the ways that technology can be beneficial to learning ( while also showing just how to use it as well). As a 7 year old child I was proficient in navigating that program, and now these children today are proficient in technology in all of its forms. It is that fact that should push educators to learn about and become experts in all of the technological advances that will enrich the learning environment. 
     As I have stated in previous entries, I am no technology guru. I know the basics and maybe a bit more than that, however, I am aware that as an educator in the digital society were living in today, it is so important to stay up to date on new developments. Now more than ever it is essential for educators to educator themselves on the future of education and where it is headed. As time goes by technology moves more to the forefront of the daily lives of everyone, not just students. Just the other day the announcement was made that within the next ten years students will be required to take computer science classes in the schools to learn to code. That is a huge change to the curriculum and the way we teach our students about computers and other digital technology. Until now we have utilized it mainly for answering questions or for different programs but now, we'll be teaching them how to create programs of their own. This change is both advantageous and a bit nerve wracking. 
     Children learn best when they are fully engaged and their interests are being addressed, and we can no longer deny that their biggest interests are majorly driven by technology. That being said, technology should find its way into any and every lesson that it will enrich, not inhibit. It should be included to make our lives easier, and the students educational lives more fulfilling and inviting. We should be using every tool that we come across that pertains to our classrooms and will benefit our students. Of course traditional learning should still occur, however as the text states, group-based assignments are the way of the future, and studies have shown that students prefer this approach to learning.Overall, I consider my teaching style to be mainly student-centered and my goal is to create lessons that are interactive, enriching and inviting for my students. These chapters definitely taught me a little bit more about myself and my future career aspirations. 

Questions for the reader: 

1. What is your personal opinion on the addition of the computer science program to the curriculum of public schools? Is it a good thing, or will it take away from what is already being taught? 

2. As mentioned in the textbook, the Pew Internet and American Life Project characterized how people use computers and other information technologies. What category do you feel that most people new to the educational field fall into? What about seasoned veteran teachers where you have worked? Where do you fit into the scheme? Explain why you chose your answers. 

3.  In your experience, what was the most useful tool or program that you have come across while working with the SmartBoard? I am looking to expand my repertoire of skills on the SmartBoard but only have fairly basic knowledge and would love any input!


4 comments:

  1. Hi Jamie! Your first question is actually something I've thought about for a while. I always wondered why we teach the math subjects we teach in schools, specially, why do we choose to teach the specific algebra topics we do, and why don't we branch out into computer sciences more? I think adding it to a school curriculum is such a great addition, in that students will be able to explore just a vast topic that really does have such a huge role on their daily activities. They will be able to investigate why their computers work the way they do on their own, and possibly be able to relate to students on an entirely new level! I may just be quite naive about how it will work in a school, but I'm excited!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Jamie,
    I totally agree with you that meeting the needs of students is our central job when determining the best course of action for lessons. It is no longer one size fits all (it never was). Technology is in the lives of our learners and we must become involved with technology. Furthermore, student centered learning is so important. When I was student teaching, I tried to do as much student centered learning to keep their minds and mouths working (academically). To answer your question about computer science being incorporated into public schools, I think it is very important since it is central to everyone's lives. Back when I was in school, we had a type of computer science class (it was typing-but it was the closest thing we had to it!), and it showed me how to use a computer safely and logically. Expanding on this would only benefit the digital natives.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the addition of a computer science program is a great thing! I myself feel that I could have benefited from these classes while I was in school. I would have loved to have the technological edge and be able to be a leader with new technologies and although I believe some people can adapt very quickly to these changes, others need direct instruction.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with your comments about how technology should be incorporated. Wherever a lesson can be enhanced by technology, technology is a welcome addition. However, if it is going to inhibit a lesson, it should not be used. It's important to recognize the limitations of technology as much as it is important to recognize the benefits, of which there are many. Using technology selectively and expertly is the most important factor in it's incorporation into the classroom. It can easily become a distraction. I've noticed recently that it works well as a behavior management tool for younger children. My second grade class enjoys seeing the points they earn for good behavior/work. I think the key here is that technology allows for students to become active participants in ways they couldn't before.

    You also mentioned that we can no longer deny that technology is an interest to our students. It's always important to be aware of the population you are serving, and I think it is vital that we accept the interests of our students and try to integrate them, wherever possible, rather than fight against them. Using subjects that your students are interested in can only serve as a positive motivator.

    ReplyDelete